Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MISDAY v. ALLIED COLLECTION SERVICE INC., 2:15-cv-01890. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20151204b25 Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 03, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED ORDER (FIRST REQUEST) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff Thomas Misday ("Mr. Misday"), through his attorney David Krieger, and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo") (incorrectly identified in the Complaint as Wells Fargo Financial National Bank), through their attorneys, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., as follows:
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED ORDER

(FIRST REQUEST)

It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff Thomas Misday ("Mr. Misday"), through his attorney David Krieger, and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo") (incorrectly identified in the Complaint as Wells Fargo Financial National Bank), through their attorneys, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., as follows:

Mr. Misday filed his Complaint on October 1, 2015 (Docket #1). Wells Fargo was served on October 7, 2015. In the interest of conserving client and judicial resources, Mr. Misday and Wells Fargo stipulate and agree that Wells Fargo shall have until December 18, 2015, in which to file its responsive pleading. This is the parties' first request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party, but is intended so the parties may discuss settlement.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED THAT Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended to on or before December 18, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer