Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DOE v. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT/FOOTHILL HIGH SCHOOL/CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT POLICE, 2:15-cv-00793-RFB-GWF. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20151209779 Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 26, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS TO DISMISS (Second Request) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . COME NOW the parties, by and through their counsel of record, and hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Defendants to file their replies in support of the Motions to Dismiss, Docket Nos. 15 and 16, up to and including November 9, 2015. The replies are currently due November 3, 2015. The parties stipulated to an extension of ti
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS TO DISMISS (Second Request)

COME NOW the parties, by and through their counsel of record, and hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Defendants to file their replies in support of the Motions to Dismiss, Docket Nos. 15 and 16, up to and including November 9, 2015. The replies are currently due November 3, 2015. The parties stipulated to an extension of time for Plaintiffs to file their responses up to October 19, 2015, and in that stipulation the parties agreed replies would be due November 3rd. Docket No. 19. This request may technically be considered a second request as Docket No. 19 allowed an additional 8 days for the replies.

Plaintiffs' response to Docket No. 15 exceeds the page limitation under the local rules for responses which Plaintiffs have sought leave to exceed. Additionally, defense counsel's office, the Clark County School District Legal Office, is closed October 30th for Nevada day and defense counsel has a summary judgment motion due in a federal employment discrimination case on November 4th. When entering the stipulation providing for the current reply due date, the undersigned defense counsel neglected to recall these other matters which impact his ability to finalize the replies for this matter in addition to the fact that Plaintiffs' response on the substantive motion to dismiss exceeds the usual page limitation.

Therefore, the parties agree and request that Defendants may have up to and including November 9, 2015 to file replies in support of Docket Nos. 15 and 16.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer