Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ABEYTA v. BANK OF AMERICA, 2:15-cv-02320-RCJ-NJK. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20151211a78 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 10, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between Plaintiff Ginney Abeyta ("Ms. Abeyta"), through her attorney David Krieger, and Defendant Wells Fargo Card Services ("Wells Fargo"), through their attorneys, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., as follows: Ms. Abeyta filed her Complaint on August 5, 2015 (Docket #1). Wells Fargo was served on November 20, 2
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between Plaintiff Ginney Abeyta ("Ms. Abeyta"), through her attorney David Krieger, and Defendant Wells Fargo Card Services ("Wells Fargo"), through their attorneys, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., as follows:

Ms. Abeyta filed her Complaint on August 5, 2015 (Docket #1). Wells Fargo was served on November 20, 2015. In the interest of conserving client and judicial resources, Ms. Brown and Wells Fargo stipulate and agree that Wells Fargo shall have until January 16, 2016 in which to file its responsive pleading.

This is the parties' first request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party, but is intended so the parties may discuss settlement.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED THAT Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended to on or before January 16, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer