Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BALLENTINE v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, 2:14-cv-01584-APG-GWF. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20151223h08 Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2015
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order (#67); Defendant's Motion for Protective Order (as to Plaintiff's Notice of Taking Deposition of FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and Request for Production Nos. 6, 7, 8 (#83); Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Request for Production of Documents Nos. 6, 7, 8, 12, 13 (Plaintiff's First Set of Request for Production of Documents to Defendant LVMPD) (#
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order (#67); Defendant's Motion for Protective Order (as to Plaintiff's Notice of Taking Deposition of FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and Request for Production Nos. 6, 7, 8 (#83); Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Request for Production of Documents Nos. 6, 7, 8, 12, 13 (Plaintiff's First Set of Request for Production of Documents to Defendant LVMPD) (#84); Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant LVMPD to Answer Plaintiff Brian Ballentine's Interrogatory No. 3 (#86); and Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Request for Production No. 19 (#88). The Court conducted a hearing in this matter on December 9, 2015. The Court further discussed these motions with counsel for the parties during the hearing on December 21, 2015. After considering the papers submitted by the parties, as well as oral argument by counsel, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order (#67); Defendant's Motion for Protective Order (as to Plaintiff's Notice of Taking Deposition of FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness and Request for Production Nos. 6, 7, 8 (#83); Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Request for Production of Documents Nos. 6, 7, 8, 12, 13 (Plaintiff's First Set of Request for Production of Documents to Defendant LVMPD) (#84); Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant LVMPD to Answer Plaintiff Brian Ballentine's Interrogatory No. 3 (#86); and Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to Request for Production No. 19 (#88) are granted in part, and denied, for the reasons set forth on the record during the hearings, except as follows:

The Court defers its decision on Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production of Documents (#84) with respect to Requests for Production of Documents Nos. 12 and 13. As discussed during the hearings, the parties will meet and confer regarding the feasibility of producing the requested documents and if production is feasible, how the expense of production should be allocated. The parties are to file status reports on these requests once they complete their meet and confer process.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer