Filed: Dec. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2015
Summary: BY WESTGATE RESORTS, INC.; WESTGATE RESORTS LTD., CENTRAL FLORIDA INVESTMENTS, INC., WESTGATE LAS VEGAS RESORTS, LLC'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Defendants Westgate Resorts, Inc., Westgate Resorts Ltd., Central Florida Investments, Inc., and Westgate Las Vegas Resorts, LLC ("Westgate") file this unopposed motion to briefly extend the deadline to submit a Reply Memorandum to Plaint
Summary: BY WESTGATE RESORTS, INC.; WESTGATE RESORTS LTD., CENTRAL FLORIDA INVESTMENTS, INC., WESTGATE LAS VEGAS RESORTS, LLC'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Defendants Westgate Resorts, Inc., Westgate Resorts Ltd., Central Florida Investments, Inc., and Westgate Las Vegas Resorts, LLC ("Westgate") file this unopposed motion to briefly extend the deadline to submit a Reply Memorandum to Plainti..
More
BY WESTGATE RESORTS, INC.; WESTGATE RESORTS LTD., CENTRAL FLORIDA INVESTMENTS, INC., WESTGATE LAS VEGAS RESORTS, LLC'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
Defendants Westgate Resorts, Inc., Westgate Resorts Ltd., Central Florida Investments, Inc., and Westgate Las Vegas Resorts, LLC ("Westgate") file this unopposed motion to briefly extend the deadline to submit a Reply Memorandum to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or Alternatively, Motion for a More Definite Statement [DE 21 and DE 22 the "Opposition"] until January 11, 2016, and respectfully show the Court as follows:
1. Plaintiffs' Opposition was served on December 17, 2015, and an "errata" to Plaintiffs' Opposition was filed on December 18, 2015.
2. Due to the holidays and other professional responsibilities, Defendants seek a brief extension to serve their Reply until January 11, 2016, and Plaintiffs consent to the requested extension.
3. This Motion is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
4. Pursuant to this Court's inherent authority and the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(A), Defendants respectfully request an extension until January 11, 2016, to serve their Reply.
IT IS ORDERED.
