Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

WIDE VOICE, LLC v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P., 2:15-cv-01604-GMN-VCF. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20151229921 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 28, 2015
Summary: DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION [DKT. # 31] TO PARTIALLY STAY DISCOVERY [FIRST REQUEST] CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rule 6-1 and 6-2, Defendant Sprint Communications Company L.P. ("Sprint"), respectfully requests that the deadline for replying in support of its Motion (Docket # 31) to Partially Stay Discovery be extended from December 28, 2015, to January 5, 2016.
More

DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION [DKT. # 31] TO PARTIALLY STAY DISCOVERY

[FIRST REQUEST]

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rule 6-1 and 6-2, Defendant Sprint Communications Company L.P. ("Sprint"), respectfully requests that the deadline for replying in support of its Motion (Docket # 31) to Partially Stay Discovery be extended from December 28, 2015, to January 5, 2016. This is the first request for an extension of this deadline. Sprint filed its Motion to Partially Stay Discovery (Docket # 31) on November 23, 2015. Wide Voice served its Opposition (Docket # 35) on December 17, 2015, thereby making Sprint's deadline to file its reply December 28, 2015. Good cause exists for this extension: the current reply timeframe includes the Christmas Eve and Christmas Day holidays. Sprint's lead counsel is on vacation between Christmas and New Year. In addition, the Sprint in-house counsel working with Sprint's counsel on this matter is out of the office until January 4, 2016. Therefore, Sprint respectfully requests an extension to January 5, 2016, to file its reply. This Motion is not made for the purpose of undue delay, but to allow Sprint adequate time in which to reply in support of its Motion.

On December 22, 2015, counsel for Sprint conferred with counsel for Wide Voice, and Wide Voice does not oppose the requested extension.

Accordingly, Sprint respectfully requests that the Court enter an order extending the deadline for Sprint's reply to January 5, 2016.

ORDER

Having read and considered Defendant Sprint Communications Company L.P.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Reply in Support of Defendant's Motion to Partially Stay Discovery, the Motion is hereby GRANTED. Defendant's time to file its reply is extended up to and including January 5, 2016.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer