Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

KORONIK v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, : 2:13-cv-02060-APG-GWF. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160104655 Visitors: 22
Filed: Dec. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 31, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING THE DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS PENDING THE COURT'S DETERMINATION OF THE MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE. FIRST REQUEST GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff/Counter-defendant David Koronik ("Koronik"), Defendant/Counterclaimant Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac") and Intervenor Federal Housing Finance Agency, as Freddie Mac's Conservator ("FHFA"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree and stipulat
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING THE DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS PENDING THE COURT'S DETERMINATION OF THE MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE.

FIRST REQUEST

Plaintiff/Counter-defendant David Koronik ("Koronik"), Defendant/Counterclaimant Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac") and Intervenor Federal Housing Finance Agency, as Freddie Mac's Conservator ("FHFA"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on May 28, 2015, the Court entered an Order granting the Stipulation to Reopen Discovery (First Request) (Doc.#18) that provided a December 30, 2015 deadline to file dispositive motions.

WHEREAS, on November 30, 3015, the Court entered an Order granting Freddie Mac and FHFA's Motion to Stay Discovery (Doc.#40) whereby the Court ordered that "[d]iscovery proceedings are stayed pending the Court's determination of the following motion:

1. Intervenors' Motion to Consolidate Action with Case No. 2:15-cv-1338-GMN-CWH (#39)"

WHEREAS, until the Court decides the Motion to Consolidate, the parties wish to stay the deadline to file dispositive motion for the same reasons set forth in the Court's Order granting Freddie Mac and FHFA's Motion to Stay Discovery (Doc.#40).

WHEREAS, good cause exists to stay the dispositive motion deadline in this action because discovery has been stayed and in furtherance of the interests of judicial economy dispositive motions should be decided by the Court that will ultimately hear the claims in this action.

IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED that the deadlines for the parties to file dispositive motions shall be stayed pending the Court's determination of the Motion to Consolidate.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer