AMEZCUA v. JORDAN TRANSPORT, INC., 2:13-cv-01608-APG-CWH. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160105c53
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2015
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY LOUANNE BOON SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Defendant Louanne Boon caused an answer to be filed that was not factually supported because she admitted the plaintiffs' allegation that she was driving the truck involved in an accident, when in fact her husband had been driving. ( Compare Dkt. #1-1 at 4 (alleging Louanne Boon was driving) & Dkt. #28-7 at 1 (admitting that allegation) with Dkt. #28-4 at 55-56 (testifying that her husband w
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY LOUANNE BOON SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Defendant Louanne Boon caused an answer to be filed that was not factually supported because she admitted the plaintiffs' allegation that she was driving the truck involved in an accident, when in fact her husband had been driving. ( Compare Dkt. #1-1 at 4 (alleging Louanne Boon was driving) & Dkt. #28-7 at 1 (admitting that allegation) with Dkt. #28-4 at 55-56 (testifying that her husband wa..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY LOUANNE BOON SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
Defendant Louanne Boon caused an answer to be filed that was not factually supported because she admitted the plaintiffs' allegation that she was driving the truck involved in an accident, when in fact her husband had been driving. (Compare Dkt. #1-1 at 4 (alleging Louanne Boon was driving) & Dkt. #28-7 at 1 (admitting that allegation) with Dkt. #28-4 at 55-56 (testifying that her husband was driving and they switched places at the scene of the accident).) She also falsely stated that she was the driver when she verified her responses to interrogatories. (Compare Dkt. #28-2 at 4 with Dkt. #28-4 at 63-64, 70.)
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant Louanne Boon shall show cause in writing on or before January 29, 2016 why she should not be sanctioned under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 or under the court's inherent power for filing a false answer and a false response to an interrogatory in this case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any other party wishing to be heard on the matter may file a brief on or before January 29, 2016.
Source: Leagle
