U.S. v. CHEE, 2:14-cr-00033-KJD-CWH. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160119c16
Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 14, 2015
Summary: ORDER C.W. HOFFMAN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the court is interested party Clark County's Emergency Motion to Quash Subpoenas (ECF No. 61), filed on December 9, 2015. The court has reviewed the motion and determined that it does not require emergency treatment given that the trial date is not until April 18, 2016. The court therefore will impose the standard briefing schedule. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that responses to the Clark County's Emergency Motion to Quash Subpoenas
Summary: ORDER C.W. HOFFMAN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the court is interested party Clark County's Emergency Motion to Quash Subpoenas (ECF No. 61), filed on December 9, 2015. The court has reviewed the motion and determined that it does not require emergency treatment given that the trial date is not until April 18, 2016. The court therefore will impose the standard briefing schedule. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that responses to the Clark County's Emergency Motion to Quash Subpoenas ..
More
ORDER
C.W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the court is interested party Clark County's Emergency Motion to Quash Subpoenas (ECF No. 61), filed on December 9, 2015. The court has reviewed the motion and determined that it does not require emergency treatment given that the trial date is not until April 18, 2016. The court therefore will impose the standard briefing schedule.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that responses to the Clark County's Emergency Motion to Quash Subpoenas (ECF No. 61) must be filed by December 28, 2015.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that replies in support of Clark County's Emergency Motion to Quash Subpoenas must be filed by January 7, 2016.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Clark County's deadline to produce documents in response to the subpoenas is STAYED until the court issues an order on Clark County's Emergency Motion to Quash Subpoenas. If the court denies the motion, it will set a new deadline for Clark County to respond to the subpoenas.
Source: Leagle
