TURPIN v. TROPICANA LAS VEGAS HOTEL, 2:14-cv-01782-GMN-PAL. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160126i74
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 29, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , District Judge . Pursuant to LR 6-1, 6-2, and 7-1, Plaintiff Melvin Turpin ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Tropicana Las Vegas, Inc. ("Tropicana" or "Defendant") 1 by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to extend the time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. #23.) This is the par
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , District Judge . Pursuant to LR 6-1, 6-2, and 7-1, Plaintiff Melvin Turpin ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Tropicana Las Vegas, Inc. ("Tropicana" or "Defendant") 1 by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to extend the time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. #23.) This is the part..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST)
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, District Judge.
Pursuant to LR 6-1, 6-2, and 7-1, Plaintiff Melvin Turpin ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Tropicana Las Vegas, Inc. ("Tropicana" or "Defendant")1 by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to extend the time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. #23.) This is the parties' first request.
The parties request a brief three (3) week extension of time, up to and including January 18, 2016, for the limited purpose of Plaintiff filing his response. This extension is requested to accommodate the holidays and for purposes of settlement discussions.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that Plaintiff has up to and including Monday, January 18, 2016, to file a Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. #23.)
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Defendant has twenty (20) days after service of the Response to file and serve its Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment.
DATED this 28th day of December, 2015. DATED this 28th day of December, 2015.
Holman Law Office Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak &
Stewart, P.C.
/s/ Kristina S. Holman /s/ Dana B. Krulewitz
Kristina S. Holman, Esq. Anthony L. Martin, Esq.
703 S. Eighth Street Dana B. Krulewitz, Esq.
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway
Telephone: 702.614.4777 Suite 1500
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Attorney for Plaintiff Telephone: 702.369.6800
Attorneys for Defendant Tropicana
Las Vegas, Inc.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Plaintiff erroneously named Tropicana Las Vegas Hotel and Casino, Inc. and Tropicana Resort & Casino, LLC.
Source: Leagle