Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

RIKER v. BAKER, 3:99-cv-00222-LRH-WGC. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160107943 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2016
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . This capital habeas corpus action has been stayed since February 21, 2003, pending proceedings in state court. See Order entered February 21, 2003 (ECF No. 79); Report on Status of Proceedings filed June 15, 2015 (ECF No. 124). On December 3, 2015, the petitioner, David Robert Riker, filed a Motion to Lift Stay and Dismiss Petition (ECF No. 125). In that motion, Riker states: On February 21, 2003, this Court entered an order staying this action to
More

ORDER

This capital habeas corpus action has been stayed since February 21, 2003, pending proceedings in state court. See Order entered February 21, 2003 (ECF No. 79); Report on Status of Proceedings filed June 15, 2015 (ECF No. 124). On December 3, 2015, the petitioner, David Robert Riker, filed a Motion to Lift Stay and Dismiss Petition (ECF No. 125). In that motion, Riker states:

On February 21, 2003, this Court entered an order staying this action to allow petitioner to exhaust his state remedies. Docket Nos. 78 and 79. The state proceedings are now concluded. A new judgment of conviction was filed on February 13, 2014, Ex. 1, and the time for filing a state post-conviction [petition] for writ of habeas corpus has expired. Nev. Rev. Stat. § 34.726. The agreement underlying the new judgment of conviction included an agreement to dismiss the pending federal habeas corpus petition. Ex. 2 at 2. Accordingly, pursuant to this Court's order, Docket No. 79, Mr. Riker hereby moves this Court to vacate the stay previously entered, and to dismiss his petition for writ of habeas corpus and close this action.

Motion to Lift Stay and Dismiss Petition, pp. 1-2 (Exhibits 1 and 2, referred to in the quoted portion of the motion, are attached to the motion, and found at ECF No. 125-1). The respondents did not respond to Riker's Motion to Lift Stay and Dismiss Petition.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's Motion to Lift Stay and Dismiss Petition (ECF No. 125) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the stay of this action is lifted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer