PARAGON HOMES, LLC v. ASCENT HOME LOANS, INC., 2:15-cv-02157-RCJ-NJK (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160111850
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2016
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . On November 23, 2015, an answer was filed. Docket No. 5. The Rule 26(f) conference was required to be held within 30 days after the first defendant's answer or appearance. See Local Rule 26-1(d) ("Counsel for plaintiff shall initiate the scheduling of the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) meeting within thirty (30) days after the first defendant answers or otherwise appears"). The stipulated discovery plan was due 14 days thereafter. See Local Rule 26-1(d)
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . On November 23, 2015, an answer was filed. Docket No. 5. The Rule 26(f) conference was required to be held within 30 days after the first defendant's answer or appearance. See Local Rule 26-1(d) ("Counsel for plaintiff shall initiate the scheduling of the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) meeting within thirty (30) days after the first defendant answers or otherwise appears"). The stipulated discovery plan was due 14 days thereafter. See Local Rule 26-1(d) (..
More
ORDER
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
On November 23, 2015, an answer was filed. Docket No. 5. The Rule 26(f) conference was required to be held within 30 days after the first defendant's answer or appearance. See Local Rule 26-1(d) ("Counsel for plaintiff shall initiate the scheduling of the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) meeting within thirty (30) days after the first defendant answers or otherwise appears"). The stipulated discovery plan was due 14 days thereafter. See Local Rule 26-1(d) ("Fourteen (14) days after the mandatory Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, the parties shall submit a stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order"). As such, the stipulated discovery plan was due on January 7, 2016. The parties failed to timely file such a plan.
The parties are hereby ORDERED to show cause in writing, no later than January 15, 2016, why they failed to comply with the Local Rules as outlined above. Alternatively, the filing of a joint proposed discovery plan by that date will suffice to discharge this order to show cause.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
