Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

RELMADA THERAPEUTICS, INC. v. LAIDLAW & COMPANY (UK) LTD., 2:15-cv-2338-JCM-CWH. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160113a61 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIM CARL W. HOFFMAN , District Judge . Pursuant to LR 6-1 and 7-1, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Relmada Therapeutics, Inc. ("Relmada"), by and through its undersigned counsel of record, and Defendants/Counterclaimants Laidlaw & Company (UK) Ltd., Matthew D. Eitner, and James P. Ahern (collectively, Laidlaw by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree, subject to the Court's approval, that the time for
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIM

Pursuant to LR 6-1 and 7-1, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Relmada Therapeutics, Inc. ("Relmada"), by and through its undersigned counsel of record, and Defendants/Counterclaimants Laidlaw & Company (UK) Ltd., Matthew D. Eitner, and James P. Ahern (collectively, Laidlaw by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree, subject to the Court's approval, that the time for Relmada to answer or otherwise respond to Laidlaw's Counterclaim shall be extended as set forth below, and in support thereof state as follows:

1. Relmada filed its Complaint on December 9, 2015 [Dkt. 1].

2. Laidlaw was served with a copy of a summons and a copy of the Complaint in this matter on December 9, 2015 [Dkts. 5, 7-9].

3. Laidlaw filed their Answer and Counterclaim on December 16, 2015 [Dkt. 22]. Other than Relmada, no other counterdefendants have been served with the Counterclaim.

4. Relmada's deadline to respond to the Counterclaim is January 11, 2016.

5. Counsel have conferred to discuss a continued date for Relamda to respond to Laidlaw's Counterclaim.

6. The parties agree that the deadline for Relmada to answer or otherwise respond to the Counterclaim shall be on or before January 25, 2016.

7. This stipulation is made in good faith and is not sought for delay or any improper purpose.

WHEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court enter an Order extending the time for Relmada to answer or otherwise respond to the Counterclaim to on or before January 25, 2016.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer