Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SILVER STATE BROADCASTING, LLC v. BEASLEY FM ACQUISITION CORPORATION, 2:11-cv-1789-APG-CWH. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160119a20 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE JOINT PRE-TRIAL ORDER CARL W. HOFFMAN , District Judge . Defendants/Counter-Claimants Beasley FM Acquisition Corp., Beasley Broadcasting of Nevada, LLC, WAEC License Limited Partnership and KJUL License LLC ("Beasley"); Defendant Michael Jay Bergner dba Bergner & Co. ("Bergner") and Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendant Silver State Broadcasting, LLC and Golden State Broadcasting LLC (collectively "Plaintiffs") (Beasley, Bergner and Plaintiffs are col
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE JOINT PRE-TRIAL ORDER

Defendants/Counter-Claimants Beasley FM Acquisition Corp., Beasley Broadcasting of Nevada, LLC, WAEC License Limited Partnership and KJUL License LLC ("Beasley"); Defendant Michael Jay Bergner dba Bergner & Co. ("Bergner") and Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendant Silver State Broadcasting, LLC and Golden State Broadcasting LLC (collectively "Plaintiffs") (Beasley, Bergner and Plaintiffs are collectively referred to herein as the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

(1) The Parties had previously stipulated to extend the time to file the Joint Pretrial Order until thirty (30) days after the decision of the dispositive motions or further order of the Court [Dkt. #175]; and (2) Beasley and Silver State Broadcasting, LLC agreed at the hearing on Beasley's Motion for Summary Judgment, and in a formal stipulation [Dkt. #238] to allow Beasley's previously-filed Motion for Summary Judgment on Counterclaim [Dkt. #183] to apply to the newly-filed [and answered] Amended Counter-Claim.

Therefore, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree to continue the deadline to file the Joint Pre-Trial Order until thirty (30) days after the Court issues its ruling on Beasley's Motion for Summary Judgment pertaining to its counterclaim [Dkt #183].

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer