Filed: Jan. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE REPLY DEADLINE CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between CHARLES COOPER, through his attorneys of record, JAMES A. ORONOZ, ESQ., and LUCAS J. GAFFNEY, ESQ., of the law firm ORONOZ & ERICSSON LLC, and PHILLIP SMITH JR., Assistant United States Attorney, that CHARLES COOPER shall have to and including January 18, 2016, within which to file replies to the Government's Response (Doc. #89) to Cooper's Motion to Suppress, which
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE REPLY DEADLINE CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between CHARLES COOPER, through his attorneys of record, JAMES A. ORONOZ, ESQ., and LUCAS J. GAFFNEY, ESQ., of the law firm ORONOZ & ERICSSON LLC, and PHILLIP SMITH JR., Assistant United States Attorney, that CHARLES COOPER shall have to and including January 18, 2016, within which to file replies to the Government's Response (Doc. #89) to Cooper's Motion to Suppress, which i..
More
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE REPLY DEADLINE
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between CHARLES COOPER, through his attorneys of record, JAMES A. ORONOZ, ESQ., and LUCAS J. GAFFNEY, ESQ., of the law firm ORONOZ & ERICSSON LLC, and PHILLIP SMITH JR., Assistant United States Attorney, that CHARLES COOPER shall have to and including January 18, 2016, within which to file replies to the Government's Response (Doc. #89) to Cooper's Motion to Suppress, which is currently due January 4, 2016. This is the first request to continue the reply deadline for the aforementioned pleading.
This stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:
1. The Reply to the Government's Response (Document #89) to Cooper's Motion to Suppress is currently due January 4, 2016. However, counsel for Charles Cooper is set to begin a multiple-week long trial in case number 2:12-cr-463 on that same day. Because counsel is currently preparing for trial, and will be in trial for the next two to three weeks, counsel respectfully requests additional time to draft and file Cooper's Reply to Document #89.
2. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay.
3. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant, CHARLES COOPER, shall have to and including January 18, 2016, within which to file his reply to Document #89.
