Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. SANGALANG, 2:08-CR-163 JCM (GWF). (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160127a63 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2016
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Presently before the court is the case of United States of America v. Sangalang et al., case number 2:08-cr-00163-JCM-GWF. On January 22, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation for sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). (Doc. # 694). The parties have reached an agreement concerning a discretionary sentence reduction for defendant Deandre Patton. Included in the joint stipulation is a declaration from the defendant consenting t
More

ORDER

Presently before the court is the case of United States of America v. Sangalang et al., case number 2:08-cr-00163-JCM-GWF.

On January 22, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation for sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). (Doc. # 694). The parties have reached an agreement concerning a discretionary sentence reduction for defendant Deandre Patton.

Included in the joint stipulation is a declaration from the defendant consenting to the entry of an amended sentence and setting forth the appropriate waivers. (Doc. # 694). The joint stipulation also contains a certification by defense counsel that counsel has communicated with the defendant and that the defendant consents to the proposed resolution. (Id.) Finally, the joint stipulation sets forth the amended guidelines sentencing range as calculated by the parties and an agreement to a particular sentence. (Id.)

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the party stipulation (doc. # 694) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. Defendant Deandre Patton shall receive the agreed upon sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the defendant's sentence of imprisonment on counts one and two is reduced to 120 months' imprisonment (for a total sentence of 180 months). All other provisions of the judgment dated December 22, 2010, are to remain in effect.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer