Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ABEYTA v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 2:15-cv-02320-RCJ-NJK. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160127b13 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED ORDER (FIRST REQUEST) ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff Ginney Abeyta ("Ms. Abeyta"), through her attorney Michael Kind, and Defendant Wells Fargo Card Services ("Wells Fargo"), through their attorneys, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., as follows: Ms. Abeyta filed her First Amended Complaint on January 2, 2016 (Docket #18
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED ORDER

(FIRST REQUEST)

It is hereby stipulated by and between Plaintiff Ginney Abeyta ("Ms. Abeyta"), through her attorney Michael Kind, and Defendant Wells Fargo Card Services ("Wells Fargo"), through their attorneys, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., as follows:

Ms. Abeyta filed her First Amended Complaint on January 2, 2016 (Docket #18). In the interest of conserving client and judicial resources, Ms. Abeyta and Wells Fargo stipulate and agree that Wells Fargo shall have until February 29, 2016, in which to file its responsive pleading. This is the parties' first request for an extension of time to respond to the First Amended Complaint and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party, but is intended so the parties may discuss settlement.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED THAT Wells Fargo's time to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint shall be extended to on or before February 29, 2016.

IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer