FIVE SPRINGS, LLC v. IOTA VIOLET, LLC, 2:15-cv-02280-APG-PAL. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160209b06
Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2016
Summary: ORDER (Mot Consolidate — Dkt. #5) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . Before the court is the Motion to Consolidate (Dkt. #5). The court has considered the Motion, Opposition (Dkt. #11), and Reply (Dkt. #12). The motion requests to consolidate this case with Case No. 2:10-cv-00439-JCM-VCF. A motion to consolidate was also filed in that action. On December 28, 2015 Judge Ferenbach's entered a written Order (Dkt. #226) denying Five Springs Motion to Intervene in No. 2:10-cv-00439-JCM-VCF. Ju
Summary: ORDER (Mot Consolidate — Dkt. #5) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . Before the court is the Motion to Consolidate (Dkt. #5). The court has considered the Motion, Opposition (Dkt. #11), and Reply (Dkt. #12). The motion requests to consolidate this case with Case No. 2:10-cv-00439-JCM-VCF. A motion to consolidate was also filed in that action. On December 28, 2015 Judge Ferenbach's entered a written Order (Dkt. #226) denying Five Springs Motion to Intervene in No. 2:10-cv-00439-JCM-VCF. Jud..
More
ORDER
(Mot Consolidate — Dkt. #5)
PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.
Before the court is the Motion to Consolidate (Dkt. #5). The court has considered the Motion, Opposition (Dkt. #11), and Reply (Dkt. #12). The motion requests to consolidate this case with Case No. 2:10-cv-00439-JCM-VCF. A motion to consolidate was also filed in that action.
On December 28, 2015 Judge Ferenbach's entered a written Order (Dkt. #226) denying Five Springs Motion to Intervene in No. 2:10-cv-00439-JCM-VCF. Judge Ferenbach also denied Five Springs identical Motion to Consolidate in a written Order (Dkt. #227) entered January 15, 2016. A few days later Judge Mahan entered an Order denying Five Springs' motions for a Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction as moot because the property at issue in both of these cases was sold before the motions were filed. See Order (Dkt. #227). For the reasons articulated in the orders entered by Judges Mahan and Ferenbach consolidation of these two cases is not warranted.
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Consolidate (Dkt. #5) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
