Filed: Feb. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 08, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT (THIRD REQUEST) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff 2-Way Computing, Inc. ("2-Way Computing") and Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Cisco"), by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to this third request for an extension of time for Cisco to file its Answer or otherwise respond to 2-Way's Complaint for Patent Infringement ("Complaint"). On January 12, 2016, the parties filed
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT (THIRD REQUEST) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff 2-Way Computing, Inc. ("2-Way Computing") and Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Cisco"), by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to this third request for an extension of time for Cisco to file its Answer or otherwise respond to 2-Way's Complaint for Patent Infringement ("Complaint"). On January 12, 2016, the parties filed ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
(THIRD REQUEST)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff 2-Way Computing, Inc. ("2-Way Computing") and Defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Cisco"), by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to this third request for an extension of time for Cisco to file its Answer or otherwise respond to 2-Way's Complaint for Patent Infringement ("Complaint").
On January 12, 2016, the parties filed a Stipulation and Order for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint (Second Request). (Dkt. No. 17).1 This Stipulation was granted on January 13, 2016. (Dkt. No. 26). Cisco is continuing to investigate the allegations in the Complaint. Therefore, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), the parties state that good cause exists to extend the deadline for Cisco to Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint from February 8, 2016 to March 7, 2016 to provide Cisco with ample time to investigate the allegations.
The parties therefore stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Cisco to file its Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to March 7, 2016. This Stipulation is made for good cause and not for purposes of delay. Furthermore, this Stipulation shall not be construed as a waiver of any rights belonging to any of the parties hereto.
DUANE MORRIS LLP BORGHESE LEGAL, LTD.
By: /s/ Manita Rawat By: /s/ Mark R. Borghese
MANITA RAWAT Mark R. Borghese
Nevada Bar No.: 9656 10161 Park Run Drive, Suite 150
100 North City Parkway, Suite 1560 Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Las Vegas, NV 89106-4617 Telephone No.: (702) 382-0200
Telephone No.: (702) 868-2600 Facsimile No.: (702) 382-0212
Facsimile: (702) 385-6862
RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT
Reza, Mirzaie (Pro Hac Vice)
Matthew S. Yungwirth Paul S. Kroeger (Pro Hac Vice)
(Pro Hac Vice to be submitted) Stanley H. Thompson, Jr.
Christopher J. Tyson (Pro Hac Vice)
(Pro Hac Vice to be submitted) C. Jay Chung (Pro Hac Vice)
Jennifer H. Forte 12424 Wilshire Boulevard
(Pro Hac Vice to be submitted) 12th Floor
1075 Peachtree Street Los Angeles, California 90025
Suite 2000
Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Attorneys for Plaintiff
Attorneys for Defendant
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED that Cisco shall be allowed to file its Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before March 7, 2016.
