Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lamberth v. Clark County School District, 2:14-cv-02044-APG-GWF. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160212578 Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 09, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 09, 2016
Summary: ORDER SEALING DKT. #103 AND DIRECTING CORRECTED VERSION TO BE FILED (Dkt. #103) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . I previously ordered the plaintiffs to file a redacted version of their reply brief and attached exhibits (Dkt. #80). (Dkt. #100.) I directed that non-party minors' names must be replaced with initials. The plaintiffs filed a publicly-accessible version of their redacted brief, but they did not replace all minors' names with initials: Dkt. #103-1 at page 9 in the footnote, a
More

ORDER SEALING DKT. #103 AND DIRECTING CORRECTED VERSION TO BE FILED

(Dkt. #103)

I previously ordered the plaintiffs to file a redacted version of their reply brief and attached exhibits (Dkt. #80). (Dkt. #100.) I directed that non-party minors' names must be replaced with initials. The plaintiffs filed a publicly-accessible version of their redacted brief, but they did not replace all minors' names with initials:

Dkt. #103-1 at page 9 in the footnote, a minor's name is mentioned in full twice.

Dkt. #103-2 at page 2 in the "Specific Comments About Behavior" box, a minor's first name is mentioned four times.

Dkt. #103-2 at page 8, line 6 a minor's first name is mentioned.

Dkt. #103-2 at page 13, line 15 a minor's full name is mentioned.

Dkt. #103-2 at page 20, line 3, a minor's full name is mentioned.

Dkt. #103-2 at page 32 line 13 and line 21, minor's first names are mentioned.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall seal Dkt. #103.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs shall file a corrected redacted version of their reply brief (Dkt. #80) consistent with this Order within 14 days.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer