Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

GOTSHALK v. HELLWIG, 2:13-cv-00448-JAD-NJK. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160226855 Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2016
Summary: ORDER RE: MOTION TO WITHDRAW (Docket No. 87) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is a motion to withdraw as attorney for Defendant Stakool, Inc. Docket No. 87. The Court hereby SETS a hearing on the motion for 10:00 a.m. on February 26, 2016, in Courtroom 3C. Defendant Stakool, Inc. and its current counsel shall appear at the hearing in person. Any newly retained counsel shall also appear in person. THERE WILL BE NO EXCEPTIONS TO THESE APPEARANCE REQUIREMENTS. No
More

ORDER RE: MOTION TO WITHDRAW

(Docket No. 87)

Pending before the Court is a motion to withdraw as attorney for Defendant Stakool, Inc. Docket No. 87. The Court hereby SETS a hearing on the motion for 10:00 a.m. on February 26, 2016, in Courtroom 3C. Defendant Stakool, Inc. and its current counsel shall appear at the hearing in person. Any newly retained counsel shall also appear in person. THERE WILL BE NO EXCEPTIONS TO THESE APPEARANCE REQUIREMENTS. No later than February 16, 2016, Defendant Stakool, Inc.'s current counsel of record shall serve Stakool with this order and shall file a proof of service. Any response to the motion to withdraw shall be filed no later than February 22, 2016. Lastly, the Court wishes to highlight that corporations may appear in federal court only through licensed counsel. United States v. High Country Broad. Co., Inc., 3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir. 1993).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer