SMITH v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, 2:15-cv-00484-GMN-VCF. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160226d56
Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Before the court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend the Complaint (#47). The time to oppose has passed. To date, no opposition has been filed. Pursuant to LR 7-2 (d), "[t]he failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motions shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion." Here, it would seem that Defendant have consented to the granting of the motion. Accordingly, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY O
Summary: ORDER CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Before the court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend the Complaint (#47). The time to oppose has passed. To date, no opposition has been filed. Pursuant to LR 7-2 (d), "[t]he failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motions shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion." Here, it would seem that Defendant have consented to the granting of the motion. Accordingly, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY OR..
More
ORDER
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
Before the court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend the Complaint (#47).
The time to oppose has passed. To date, no opposition has been filed. Pursuant to LR 7-2 (d), "[t]he failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motions shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion." Here, it would seem that Defendant have consented to the granting of the motion.
Accordingly, and for good cause shown,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend the Complaint (#47) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs must file the amended complaint (#47-7) by March 3, 2016.
Source: Leagle
