MAZZA v. CHASE CARD SERVICES, 2:15-cv-02438-APG-CWH. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160229550
Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Third Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Defendants Chase Bank USA, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 1 's (collectively "Chase") response to the complaint is currently due February 19, 2016. Plaintiff Leonard Mazza and Chase stipulate and agree that Chase has up to and including March 21, 2016 to respond to the complaint, to provide time for Chase to investigate plaintiff's allegations and for the parties
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Third Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Defendants Chase Bank USA, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 1 's (collectively "Chase") response to the complaint is currently due February 19, 2016. Plaintiff Leonard Mazza and Chase stipulate and agree that Chase has up to and including March 21, 2016 to respond to the complaint, to provide time for Chase to investigate plaintiff's allegations and for the parties ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Third Request)
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Defendants Chase Bank USA, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.1's (collectively "Chase") response to the complaint is currently due February 19, 2016. Plaintiff Leonard Mazza and Chase stipulate and agree that Chase has up to and including March 21, 2016 to respond to the complaint, to provide time for Chase to investigate plaintiff's allegations and for the parties to discuss a potential early resolution of the claims asserted against Chase. This request is made in good faith and not for purpose of delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Incorrectly referred to in the caption as Chase Card Services and Chase Mortgage.
Source: Leagle
