Filed: Feb. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE A JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER [THIRD REQUEST] PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, ELENA RODRIGUEZ-MALFAVON and Defendant, CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 , by and through their respective counsel of record, do hereby stipulate and agree to extend the current deadline to file a Joint Pretrial Order of February 19, 2016, by an additional week, up to and including February 26, 2016. The parties agree that the instant
Summary: [PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE A JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER [THIRD REQUEST] PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, ELENA RODRIGUEZ-MALFAVON and Defendant, CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 , by and through their respective counsel of record, do hereby stipulate and agree to extend the current deadline to file a Joint Pretrial Order of February 19, 2016, by an additional week, up to and including February 26, 2016. The parties agree that the instant ..
More
[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE A JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER
[THIRD REQUEST]
PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, ELENA RODRIGUEZ-MALFAVON and Defendant, CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT1, by and through their respective counsel of record, do hereby stipulate and agree to extend the current deadline to file a Joint Pretrial Order of February 19, 2016, by an additional week, up to and including February 26, 2016.
The parties agree that the instant extension is necessary because although both parties have exchanged drafts of the pretrial order, the caseload and other responsibilities of counsel for both parties has not allowed them sufficient time to come to an agreement on various issues in order to complete the Pretrial Order. The instant extension is also necessary because counsel for Plaintiff has had previously scheduled commitments related to the Presidential Caucus which has taken him out of the office this week. It is important to note that a trial date has not yet been set in this case, and as such, the trial will not need to be postponed due to the requested extension.
This is the parties' third request for an extension of this deadline and it is sought in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
Dated: February 19, 2016 Dated: February 19, 2016
Respectfully submitted, Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Richard Segerblom /s/ Ethan D. Thomas
RICHARD SEGERBLOM, ESQ. BRUCE C. YOUNG, ESQ.
ETHAN D. THOMAS, ESQ.
Attorney for Plaintiff LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
ELENA RODRIGUEZ-MALFAVON
Attorneys for Defendants
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
EDWARD GOLDMAN and ANITA WILBUR
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no further extensions will be allowed.
FootNotes
1. While not specifically addressed in the Court's Order, Defendants Edward Goldman and Anita Wilbur were effectively dismissed from this action by virtue of the Court's decision on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. [Doc. #50]. As noted in that Order, the only remaining claim to be resolved at trial is Plaintiff's Title VII retaliation claim pertaining to her time in the Purchasing Department, which by law cannot be asserted against individual Defendants Goldman and Wilbur.
