Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HARDMAN v. PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, 2:14-cv-02168-JAD-NJK. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160302a20 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 23, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . PLEASE TAKE NOTE that Plaintiff Richard Hardman ( "Plaintiff" ) and Defendant Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford aka The Hartford ( "Hartford" ) by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ORDER Based on the parties' stipulation, IT IS HEREBY
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

PLEASE TAKE NOTE that Plaintiff Richard Hardman ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford aka The Hartford ("Hartford") by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

ORDER

Based on the parties' stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice, each side to bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is instructed to close this case.

Each party to bear its own costs and fees.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer