Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BURKETT v. STATE, 3:16-cv-00062-MMD-VPC. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160303b45 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2016
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . I. DISCUSSION On February 10, 2016, Defendants removed this case from state court. (Dkt. no. 1.) On February 18, 2016, Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner, filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss this case. (Dkt. no. 5.) On March 1, 2016, Defendants filed a non-opposition to Plaintiff's motion to voluntarily dismiss the case. (Dkt. no. 6.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing
More

ORDER

I. DISCUSSION

On February 10, 2016, Defendants removed this case from state court. (Dkt. no. 1.) On February 18, 2016, Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner, filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss this case. (Dkt. no. 5.) On March 1, 2016, Defendants filed a non-opposition to Plaintiff's motion to voluntarily dismiss the case. (Dkt. no. 6.)

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing "a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Court grants Plaintiff's motion to voluntarily dismiss this action because no responsive pleading has been filed in this case. As such, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice.

II. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that the motion for voluntary dismissal (dkt. no. 5) is granted.

It is further ordered that this action is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice.

It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court will enter judgment accordingly.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer