RIMINI STREET, INC. v. CHARTER OAK FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, 2:15-cv-01761-RFB-VCF. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160309h97
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2016
Summary: ORDER CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Before the court is the Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to Respond to Discovery Requests and to Extend Choice-Of-Law Discovery Cut-Off (#48). This stipulation and order does not comply with LR 6-1(b). Here, no reason has been stated for the extensions sought and the stipulation must include a statement indicating whether it is the first, second, third, etc., requested extension. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation and Ord
Summary: ORDER CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Before the court is the Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to Respond to Discovery Requests and to Extend Choice-Of-Law Discovery Cut-Off (#48). This stipulation and order does not comply with LR 6-1(b). Here, no reason has been stated for the extensions sought and the stipulation must include a statement indicating whether it is the first, second, third, etc., requested extension. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation and Orde..
More
ORDER
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
Before the court is the Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to Respond to Discovery Requests and to Extend Choice-Of-Law Discovery Cut-Off (#48). This stipulation and order does not comply with LR 6-1(b). Here, no reason has been stated for the extensions sought and the stipulation must include a statement indicating whether it is the first, second, third, etc., requested extension.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to Respond to Discovery Requests and to Extend Choice-Of-Law Discovery Cut-Off (#48) is DENIED without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
