Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

FIRST 100, LLC v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP., 2:15-cv-01303-APG-PAL. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160309h98 Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE OPPOSITION AND REPLY DEADLINES [SECOND REQUEST] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Pursuant to LR 6-1, Plaintiff FIRST 100, LLC ("Plaintiff"), Defendant FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP. ("FHLM") and Intervenor FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY ("FHFA") (FHLM and FHFA are collectively referred to as "Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to continue Plaintiff's Opposition deadline to Defendants' Motion for
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE OPPOSITION AND REPLY DEADLINES [SECOND REQUEST]

Pursuant to LR 6-1, Plaintiff FIRST 100, LLC ("Plaintiff"), Defendant FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP. ("FHLM") and Intervenor FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY ("FHFA") (FHLM and FHFA are collectively referred to as "Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to continue Plaintiff's Opposition deadline to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. 32], filed on January 11, 2016, and Defendant's Reply deadline, as follows:

On January 11, 2016, Defendants filed their Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. 32]. On January 25, 2016, this Court issued an Order granting the Parties' Stipulation to Stay Discovery [Dkt. 35] pending the outcome of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. On or around February 5, 2016, this Court issued an Order granting the Parties' Stipulation to Continue Plaintiff's Opposition deadline [Dkt. 37] to March 7, 2016. After review of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and in an effort to avoid unnecessary litigation expenses for all Parties, Plaintiff believes additional time is needed to effectively oppose Defendant's Motion [Dkt. 32].

Defendants have agreed to extend Plaintiff's Opposition deadline to allow Plaintiff to file a response on or before April 8, 2016. Plaintiff believes this extension of time will allow the Parties to resolve minor disputes regarding Defendants' ownership interest in the Property. Plaintiff has agreed to extend Defendants' Reply deadline to allow Defendants to file a reply on or before May 9, 2016. The Parties have entered into this stipulation in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer