Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Mitchell, 3:04-cr-00010-HDM-VPC. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160310c39 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 09, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2016
Summary: ORDER HOWARD D. McKIBBEN , District Judge . Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Nisha Brooks-Whittington, Assistant Federal Public Defender, have filed a motion to withdraw (#230) as defendant's counsel of record. The court received and reviewed the reduction of sentence report on defendant prepared by probation. The report concludes defendant is ineligible for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2), Amendment 782, and pursuant to U.S.S.G. 1B1.10, effective N
More

ORDER

Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Nisha Brooks-Whittington, Assistant Federal Public Defender, have filed a motion to withdraw (#230) as defendant's counsel of record. The court received and reviewed the reduction of sentence report on defendant prepared by probation. The report concludes defendant is ineligible for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), Amendment 782, and pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, effective November 1, 2014, as he was sentenced pursuant to an enhanced and statutory requirement of Life imprisonment.

The court appointed defendant counsel to determine whether he qualifies for a reduction of sentence. Based upon probation's report, counsel does not intend to file a motion for a reduction. The court will therefore grant the motion to withdraw.

Prior to the appointment of counsel, defendant filed a motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The court does not find a response from the United States Attorney's office is necessary for a ruling on defendant's motion. Defendant was sentenced pursuant to an enhanced and statutory requirement of Life imprisonment and is therefore ineligible for a sentence reduction.

Accordingly, defendant's motion to withdraw (#230) is GRANTED.

Furthermore, defendant's motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)(#226) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer