Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

FREEDMAN v. THE VONS COMPANIES, INC., 2:15-cv-0474-JAD-CWH. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160328c68 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 25, 2016
Summary: Order Denying Motion for Leave to Amend and Vacating Hearing [ECF 39] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Rosa Freedman requests leave to file an amended complaint to name two new individual defendants to this lawsuit. 1 Freedman has failed to comply with Local Rule 15-1, which requires "the moving party to attach the proposed amended pleading to any motion to amend, so that it will be complete in itself without reference to the superseding pleading." Because Freedman did not attach her
More

Order Denying Motion for Leave to Amend and Vacating Hearing [ECF 39]

Rosa Freedman requests leave to file an amended complaint to name two new individual defendants to this lawsuit.1 Freedman has failed to comply with Local Rule 15-1, which requires "the moving party to attach the proposed amended pleading to any motion to amend, so that it will be complete in itself without reference to the superseding pleading." Because Freedman did not attach her proposed amended complaint to her motion, I deny her motion for leave to amend without prejudice and vacate the hearing on the motion currently scheduled for March 28, 2016.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's second motion to amend/correct complaint [ECF 39] is DENIED without prejudice; and the motion hearing set for March 28, 2016, at 11:30 a.m. is VACATED.

FootNotes


1. ECF 39.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer