Trustees of the Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. Forsman, Inc., 2:13-cv-01456-JAD-GWF. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160331h94
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2016
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5). The Stipulation and Order to Extend Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (Third Request) (#44) filed March 23, 2015, required the parties to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5) no later than June 23, 2015, or 30 days after a decision on the dispositive motions. A motion for summary judgment (#45) was decided on Febru
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5). The Stipulation and Order to Extend Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (Third Request) (#44) filed March 23, 2015, required the parties to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5) no later than June 23, 2015, or 30 days after a decision on the dispositive motions. A motion for summary judgment (#45) was decided on Februa..
More
ORDER
GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5). The Stipulation and Order to Extend Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (Third Request) (#44) filed March 23, 2015, required the parties to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5) no later than June 23, 2015, or 30 days after a decision on the dispositive motions. A motion for summary judgment (#45) was decided on February 16, 2016, in which case the date for filing the Joint Pretrial Order was suspended until 30 days after the decision. There are no further dispositive motions pending. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that
1. Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than April 11, 2016. Failure to timely comply will result in the imposition of sanctions up to and including a recommendation to the District Judge that the complaint be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
2. The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and any objections thereto shall be included in the pretrial order.
Source: Leagle
