IN RE APPLICATION OF KATE O'KEEFE TO ISSUE SUBPOENA FOR TAKING DEPOSITION OF PRODUCTION, 2:14-cv-01518-RFB-CWH. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160421b89
Filed: Apr. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . On April 4, 2016, the Court directed the parties to meet and confer, and submit a proposed protective order for this Court's review. See Doc. # 64. Thereafter, the parties submitted separate proposals in response to this Court's order without explaining why the two proposals were separately filed, and any differences between the two proposals. See Doc. # 66; Doc. # 67. The Court deems it appropriate to provide the parties with another oppo
Summary: ORDER C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . On April 4, 2016, the Court directed the parties to meet and confer, and submit a proposed protective order for this Court's review. See Doc. # 64. Thereafter, the parties submitted separate proposals in response to this Court's order without explaining why the two proposals were separately filed, and any differences between the two proposals. See Doc. # 66; Doc. # 67. The Court deems it appropriate to provide the parties with another oppor..
More
ORDER
C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
On April 4, 2016, the Court directed the parties to meet and confer, and submit a proposed protective order for this Court's review. See Doc. # 64. Thereafter, the parties submitted separate proposals in response to this Court's order without explaining why the two proposals were separately filed, and any differences between the two proposals. See Doc. # 66; Doc. # 67.
The Court deems it appropriate to provide the parties with another opportunity to submit a stipulated protective order, or to submit separate proposals that specifically identify those differences and any reasons why the parties were unable to agree.
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' proposed protective orders (docs. # 66, # 67) are denied.
IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that the parties shall file a proposed protective order, as described herein, no later than April 26, 2016.
Source: Leagle
