Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

THOMAS v. DOUGLASS, 2:14-cv-00671-JAD-GWF. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160425899 Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 21, 2016
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5). The Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#39) filed June 22, 2015, required the parties to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5) no later than April 9, 2016. There are no dispositive motions pending. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that 1. Counsel for the parties shall file a join
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5). The Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#39) filed June 22, 2015, required the parties to file a joint pretrial order required by LR 26-1(e)(5) no later than April 9, 2016. There are no dispositive motions pending. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that

1. Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than May 2, 2016. Failure to timely comply will result in the imposition of sanctions up to and including a recommendation to the District Judge that the complaint be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 2. The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and any objections thereto shall be included in the pretrial order.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer