Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. WETSELAAR, 2:11-CR-00347-KJD-CWH. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160426c36 Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . Presently before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (#209) of Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman, Jr. entered on December 1, 2015, recommending that Defendant's motion to dismiss and/or strike portions of count 14 of the superseding indictment based upon the running of the statute of limitations (#188) be granted in part and denied in part. Defendant filed an objection (#211) on December 14, 2015, to which the Government respo
More

ORDER

Presently before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (#209) of Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman, Jr. entered on December 1, 2015, recommending that Defendant's motion to dismiss and/or strike portions of count 14 of the superseding indictment based upon the running of the statute of limitations (#188) be granted in part and denied in part. Defendant filed an objection (#211) on December 14, 2015, to which the Government responded (#213).

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and LR IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Report and Recommendation (#209) of the United States Magistrate Judge entered December 1, 2015, should be ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.

Accordingly, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#209) entered December 1, 2015, are ADOPTED and AFFIRMED;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss and/or strike portions of count 14 of the superseding indictment based upon the running of the statute of limitations (#188) be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer