HALL v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 2:16-cv-00117-MMD-PAL. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160504e40
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 03, 2016
Latest Update: May 03, 2016
Summary: ORDER PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's failure to file a Certificate as to Interested Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The complaint in this matter was filed in state court and removed (Dkt. #1) to federal district court January 21, 2016. Defendant filed an Answer (Dkt. #11) April 8, 2016. LR 7.1-1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases (except habeas corpus cases) counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, ide
Summary: ORDER PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's failure to file a Certificate as to Interested Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The complaint in this matter was filed in state court and removed (Dkt. #1) to federal district court January 21, 2016. Defendant filed an Answer (Dkt. #11) April 8, 2016. LR 7.1-1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases (except habeas corpus cases) counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, iden..
More
ORDER
PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's failure to file a Certificate as to Interested Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The complaint in this matter was filed in state court and removed (Dkt. #1) to federal district court January 21, 2016. Defendant filed an Answer (Dkt. #11) April 8, 2016. LR 7.1-1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases (except habeas corpus cases) counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, identify in the disclosure statement required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) which have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case. LR 7.1-1(b) further states that if there are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect must be filed. Additionally, LR 7.1-1(c) requires a party to promptly file a supplemental certification upon any change in the information that this rule requires. To date, Plaintiff has failed to comply. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff shall file his certificate of interested parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than May 16, 2016. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.
Source: Leagle
