Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Bundy, 2:16-cr-00046-GMN-PAL. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160513g14 Visitors: 12
Filed: May 12, 2016
Latest Update: May 12, 2016
Summary: ORDER (Mots. for Joinder — Dkt. ##300, 305) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendants Ammon E. Bundy and Peter T. Santilli, Jr.'s Motions for Joinder (Dkt. ##300, 305) to Defendant Ryan W. Payne's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #291). These Motions are referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and LR IB 1-3 and 1-7 of the Local Rules of Practice. The Government filed Responses (Dkt. ##385, 386) opposing these Motions, but incorporating
More

ORDER

(Mots. for Joinder — Dkt. ##300, 305)

This matter is before the Court on Defendants Ammon E. Bundy and Peter T. Santilli, Jr.'s Motions for Joinder (Dkt. ##300, 305) to Defendant Ryan W. Payne's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #291). These Motions are referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and LR IB 1-3 and 1-7 of the Local Rules of Practice. The Government filed Responses (Dkt. ##385, 386) opposing these Motions, but incorporating its Response (Dkt. #383) to Payne's Motion to Dismiss on the merits of the motion and joinders to the motion. Defendant Santilli filed a Reply (Dkt. #396). To avoid serial motions on the same matter, the court will grant the requests to join in Payne's Motion to Dismiss.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED: Defendants Ammon E. Bundy and Peter T. Santilli, Jr.'s Motions for Joinder (Dkt. ##300, 305) are GRANTED. The Government shall not be required to file separate responses to the joinders, and its Response (Dkt. #383) to Payne's Motion to Dismiss shall serve as its responses to the Defendants granted leave to join.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer