Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LOPEZ v. CLARK COUNTY, EX REL. CLARK COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT, 2:16-cv-0218-APG-GWF. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160516a64 Visitors: 8
Filed: May 13, 2016
Latest Update: May 13, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR THE FILING OF DEFENDANT CLARK COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Danielle C. Miller, Esq. of LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP, counsel for Defendant CLARK COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT ("Defendant"), and Andrew L. Rempfer, Esq. of the LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN J. PARSON, counsel for Plaintiff Paul Lopez ("Plaintiff"), that: 1.
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR THE FILING OF DEFENDANT CLARK COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Danielle C. Miller, Esq. of LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP, counsel for Defendant CLARK COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT ("Defendant"), and Andrew L. Rempfer, Esq. of the LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN J. PARSON, counsel for Plaintiff Paul Lopez ("Plaintiff"), that:

1. The due date for Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Response (Doc. 36) to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 16) be extended from May 12, 2016 to June 2, 2016.

This is Defendant and Plaintiff's first request to extend this deadline, which is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer