Filed: May 16, 2016
Latest Update: May 16, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between Plaintiff Jose R. Babin-de-Jesus ( Plaintiff ), through his attorney David Krieger, and Defendant Bank of America, N.A. ( BANA ), through its attorneys Darren Brenner and Miles Clark with the law firm of Akerman LLP, as follows: On March 23, 2016, Plaintiff filed his Complaint (Doc. 1). On Ap
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between Plaintiff Jose R. Babin-de-Jesus ( Plaintiff ), through his attorney David Krieger, and Defendant Bank of America, N.A. ( BANA ), through its attorneys Darren Brenner and Miles Clark with the law firm of Akerman LLP, as follows: On March 23, 2016, Plaintiff filed his Complaint (Doc. 1). On Apr..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between Plaintiff Jose R. Babin-de-Jesus (Plaintiff), through his attorney David Krieger, and Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (BANA), through its attorneys Darren Brenner and Miles Clark with the law firm of Akerman LLP, as follows:
On March 23, 2016, Plaintiff filed his Complaint (Doc. 1). On April 20, 2016, BANA filed a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10). On May 14, 2016, Plaintiff filed his Opposition to BANA's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 20). BANA's reply is currently due by May 14, 2016. Plaintiff and BANA stipulate and agree that BANA shall have until May 23, 2016, in which to file its responsive pleading. This extension will permit BANA the opportunity to fully investigate and respond to the substantive arguments raised in Plaintiff's opposition.
This is the parties' first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Opposition and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED THAT Bank of America, N.A. shall have until May 23, 2016 to respond to Plaintiff's Opposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
