Brannan v. Bank of America, 2:16-cv-01004-GMN-GWF. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160524b48
Visitors: 2
Filed: May 20, 2016
Latest Update: May 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant Bank of America's Motion to Stay Discovery Pending a Ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (#6), filed on May 18, 2016. Defendant argues that discovery in this matter should be stayed pending the resolution of its Motion to Dismiss (#4). The meet and confer requirements in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1) and Local Rule 26-7(c) require the moving party to confer or attempt to confer in pers
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant Bank of America's Motion to Stay Discovery Pending a Ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (#6), filed on May 18, 2016. Defendant argues that discovery in this matter should be stayed pending the resolution of its Motion to Dismiss (#4). The meet and confer requirements in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1) and Local Rule 26-7(c) require the moving party to confer or attempt to confer in perso..
More
ORDER
GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Bank of America's Motion to Stay Discovery Pending a Ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (#6), filed on May 18, 2016. Defendant argues that discovery in this matter should be stayed pending the resolution of its Motion to Dismiss (#4).
The meet and confer requirements in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1) and Local Rule 26-7(c) require the moving party to confer or attempt to confer in person, or at least by telephone, with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve the discovery dispute. The moving party is also required to include a certification setting forth its efforts and the results of the meet-and-confer attempts. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1); LR 26-7(c). Because Defendant's motion fails to show that it has complied with these requirements prior to filing the motion,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Stay Discovery Pending a Ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (#6) denied, without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
