Scott v. Colvin, 2:14-cv-02077-JAD-CWH. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160527c98
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 25, 2016
Latest Update: May 25, 2016
Summary: Order Adopting Report and Recommendation, Denying Motion for Reversal or Remand, and Granting Cross-Motion to Affirm [ECF Nos. 11, 12, 14] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Rush Scott filed this action to seek review of the Social Security Commissioner's denial of his application for disability insurance benefits. Magistrate Judge Hoffman recommends that I deny Scott's motion for reversal or remand and grant the Commissioner's cross-motion to affirm. 1 Objections to the magistrate jud
Summary: Order Adopting Report and Recommendation, Denying Motion for Reversal or Remand, and Granting Cross-Motion to Affirm [ECF Nos. 11, 12, 14] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Rush Scott filed this action to seek review of the Social Security Commissioner's denial of his application for disability insurance benefits. Magistrate Judge Hoffman recommends that I deny Scott's motion for reversal or remand and grant the Commissioner's cross-motion to affirm. 1 Objections to the magistrate judg..
More
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation, Denying Motion for Reversal or Remand, and Granting Cross-Motion to Affirm
[ECF Nos. 11, 12, 14]
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.
Rush Scott filed this action to seek review of the Social Security Commissioner's denial of his application for disability insurance benefits. Magistrate Judge Hoffman recommends that I deny Scott's motion for reversal or remand and grant the Commissioner's cross-motion to affirm.1 Objections to the magistrate judge's recommendation were due May 20, 2016, and neither party has filed an objection or requested an extension to do so. "[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation unless objections are filed."2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Magistrate Judge Hoffman's report and recommendation [ECF No. 14] is ADOPTED; Scott's motion to remand to social security [ECF No. 11] is DENIED; and the Commissioner's motion to affirm [ECF No. 12] is GRANTED.
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and CLOSE THIS CASE.
FootNotes
1. ECF No. 14.
2. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).
Source: Leagle
