U.S. BANK v. SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, 2:15-cv-1484-KJD-VCF. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160527d02
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 25, 2016
Latest Update: May 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER COUNTER MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF NO. 52) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . This matter involves U.S Bank's civil action against Southern Highlands, SFR Investments, and other Defendants. Before the court is SFR's counter motion to compel (ECF No. 52). U.S. Bank's response was due on May 20, 2016. LR 7-2(b). As of May 25, 2016, the court has not received U.S. Bank's response. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), failure to oppose a motion constitutes to consent to the granting of that motio
Summary: ORDER COUNTER MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF NO. 52) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . This matter involves U.S Bank's civil action against Southern Highlands, SFR Investments, and other Defendants. Before the court is SFR's counter motion to compel (ECF No. 52). U.S. Bank's response was due on May 20, 2016. LR 7-2(b). As of May 25, 2016, the court has not received U.S. Bank's response. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), failure to oppose a motion constitutes to consent to the granting of that motion..
More
ORDER
COUNTER MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF NO. 52)
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
This matter involves U.S Bank's civil action against Southern Highlands, SFR Investments, and other Defendants. Before the court is SFR's counter motion to compel (ECF No. 52). U.S. Bank's response was due on May 20, 2016. LR 7-2(b). As of May 25, 2016, the court has not received U.S. Bank's response.
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), failure to oppose a motion constitutes to consent to the granting of that motion. SFR's counter motion to compel is therefore granted.
ACCORDINGLY, and for good cause shown,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that SFR's counter motion to compel (ECF No. 52) is GRANTED. On or before June 25, 2016, U.S. Bank must produce documents responsive to requests for production 1, 4, 9, 16, and 17.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
