AEVOE CORP. v. I-BLASON LLC, 2:15-cv-00149-RFB-CWH. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160601c63
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 27, 2016
Latest Update: May 27, 2016
Summary: ORDER C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Aevoe Corp.'s status report (ECF No. 84), filed on May 25, 2016. Also before the Court is Defendant i-Blason LLC's status report (ECF No. 85), filed on May 25, 2016. The parties filed the status reports pursuant to the Court's order (ECF No. 84), which temporarily stayed the case pending the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's ("PTAB") decision on whether to institute an inter partes review. In their status
Summary: ORDER C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Aevoe Corp.'s status report (ECF No. 84), filed on May 25, 2016. Also before the Court is Defendant i-Blason LLC's status report (ECF No. 85), filed on May 25, 2016. The parties filed the status reports pursuant to the Court's order (ECF No. 84), which temporarily stayed the case pending the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's ("PTAB") decision on whether to institute an inter partes review. In their status r..
More
ORDER
C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Aevoe Corp.'s status report (ECF No. 84), filed on May 25, 2016. Also before the Court is Defendant i-Blason LLC's status report (ECF No. 85), filed on May 25, 2016.
The parties filed the status reports pursuant to the Court's order (ECF No. 84), which temporarily stayed the case pending the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's ("PTAB") decision on whether to institute an inter partes review. In their status reports, the parties inform the Court that PTAB denied institution of inter partes review and that Defendant i-Blason LLC intends to request a rehearing of PTAB's decision. Defendant i-Blason LLC requests that the stay remain in effect pending a decision on rehearing. Plaintiff Aevoe Corp. opposes that request. For the reasons stated in its previous order (ECF No. 84) staying the case, and to avoid piecemeal litigation, the Court finds that the stay should remain in effect pending PTAB's decision on rehearing.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the stay will remain in effect pending the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision on Defendant i-Blason LLC's request for rehearing.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must file a joint status report within 5 days of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision on Defendant i-Blason LLC's request for rehearing.
Source: Leagle
