AZELTINE v. THE VONS COMPANIES INC., 2:16-cv-01193-APG-NJK. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160607e19
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 03, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2016
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 6) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is a joint proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 6. The Local Rules of Practice were amended effective May 1, 2016. General Order 2016-01. The joint proposed discovery plan cites the prior version of the Local Rules of Practice. See, e.g., Docket No. 6 at 1 (citing LR 26-1(e), which no longer exists). The amended LR 26-1 places additional requirements on discovery plans, including those in LR 26-1(b)(7), (8),
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 6) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is a joint proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 6. The Local Rules of Practice were amended effective May 1, 2016. General Order 2016-01. The joint proposed discovery plan cites the prior version of the Local Rules of Practice. See, e.g., Docket No. 6 at 1 (citing LR 26-1(e), which no longer exists). The amended LR 26-1 places additional requirements on discovery plans, including those in LR 26-1(b)(7), (8), ..
More
ORDER
(Docket No. 6)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is a joint proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 6. The Local Rules of Practice were amended effective May 1, 2016. General Order 2016-01. The joint proposed discovery plan cites the prior version of the Local Rules of Practice. See, e.g., Docket No. 6 at 1 (citing LR 26-1(e), which no longer exists). The amended LR 26-1 places additional requirements on discovery plans, including those in LR 26-1(b)(7), (8), and (9). The parties have failed to comply with these requirements. Accordingly, the joint proposed discovery plan is hereby DENIED without prejudice. The parties must file a new joint proposed discovery plan that complies in full with LR 26-1, no later than June 8, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
