MURNANE v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, 2:13-cv-01088-MMD-PAL. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160608b69
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 06, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE REPLY TO DEFENDANT LVMPD'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND ORDER (First Request) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . COME NOW Plaintiffs Victoria Murnane and Melissa Davis ("Plaintiffs") by and through their undersigned counsel, Margaret A. McLetchie and Alina M. Shell, of the law firm of McLetchie Shell, LLC, along with Defendant, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department ("LVMPD"), by and through i
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE REPLY TO DEFENDANT LVMPD'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND ORDER (First Request) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . COME NOW Plaintiffs Victoria Murnane and Melissa Davis ("Plaintiffs") by and through their undersigned counsel, Margaret A. McLetchie and Alina M. Shell, of the law firm of McLetchie Shell, LLC, along with Defendant, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department ("LVMPD"), by and through it..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE REPLY TO DEFENDANT LVMPD'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND ORDER
(First Request)
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
COME NOW Plaintiffs Victoria Murnane and Melissa Davis ("Plaintiffs") by and through their undersigned counsel, Margaret A. McLetchie and Alina M. Shell, of the law firm of McLetchie Shell, LLC, along with Defendant, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department ("LVMPD"), by and through its attorneys, Craig R. Andreson, Esq. and Tye S. Hanseen, Esq. of the law firm Marquis Aurbach Coffing, and hereby agree and stipulate to extend the time for Plaintiffs to file their Reply to LVMPD's Opposition to their Motion to Alter or Amend Order, which is currently due on May 26, 2016, be extended to and including May 27, 2016. This is the first request for an extension of time.
This Stipulation for an extension of time is not sought for any improper purpose or other purpose of delay, but in the interest of effectively representing Plaintiffs' interests in this matter. Plaintiffs will file their Reply as soon as possible, no later than May 27, 2016.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Source: Leagle
