Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC v. SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, 2:15-cv-00630-APG-NJK. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160613699
Filed: May 12, 2016
Latest Update: May 12, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSE TO GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 45) AND FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO THE ASSOCIATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKT. 46) AND SFR'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 48) First Request ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff Green Tree Servicing LLC, now known as Ditech Financial LLC ("Green Tree"), Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSE TO GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 45) AND FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO THE ASSOCIATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKT. 46) AND SFR'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 48)

First Request

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff Green Tree Servicing LLC, now known as Ditech Financial LLC ("Green Tree"), Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") and Defendant Spring Mountain Ranch Community Association ("Association"), by and through their undersigned attorneys, to extend the deadline for SFR and the Association to file their respective Responses to Green Tree's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF. No. 45] to June 2, 2016. Additionally, Green Tree shall have until June 2, 2016 to file its Response to SFR's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 48] and the Association's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 46].

This is the parties' first request for an extension and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED that the time to file a Response to Green Tree's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No.45] shall be extended until June 2, 2016 for SFR and the Association. Additionally, Green Tree shall have until June 2, 2016 to file its response to SFR's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 48] and the Association's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 46].

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer