Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. BUNDY, 2:16-cr-046-GMN-PAL. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160622c93 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jun. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2016
Summary: ORDER GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Pending before the Court is Defendant Cliven D. Bundy's Request that the Time for Filing the Notice of Appeal be Extended. (ECF No. 549). Defendant submits this request in response to an Order by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit explaining that Defendant's Notice of Appeal was not timely filed under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)(1)(A). See Order at 1, United States v. Bundy, No. 16-10264 (9th Cir. June 17, 2016). The
More

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendant Cliven D. Bundy's Request that the Time for Filing the Notice of Appeal be Extended. (ECF No. 549). Defendant submits this request in response to an Order by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit explaining that Defendant's Notice of Appeal was not timely filed under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)(1)(A). See Order at 1, United States v. Bundy, No. 16-10264 (9th Cir. June 17, 2016). The Ninth Circuit remanded the case to this Court "to provide [Defendant] notice and an opportunity to request that the time for filing the notice of appeal be extended . . . upon a finding of excusable neglect or good cause." (Id.).

For good cause appearing, the Court finds that Defendant's time for appeal shall be extended an additional thirty days from the fourteen-day time prescribed by Rule 4(b) to file a Notice of Appeal. Defendant filed his Notice of Appeal on June 16, 2016 (ECF No. 533), which is within the time herein extended. Accordingly,

IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendant's Notice of Appeal (ECF No. 533) is timely.

The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this Order to the Ninth Circuit.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer