FIRST MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY v. T.H.E. INSURANCE COMPANY, 2:16-cv-00091-APG-CWH. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160712a75
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 08, 2016
Summary: ORDER C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . On June 16, 2016, the court entered a minute order denying without prejudice the parties' stipulated discovery plan because it did not comply with Local Rule 26-1. (Min. Order (ECF No. 20).) The court required the parties to meet and confer and to file a revised stipulated discovery plan that complies with Local Rule 26-1. ( Id. ) The parties filed a revised stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order that still does not comply with Local Ru
Summary: ORDER C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . On June 16, 2016, the court entered a minute order denying without prejudice the parties' stipulated discovery plan because it did not comply with Local Rule 26-1. (Min. Order (ECF No. 20).) The court required the parties to meet and confer and to file a revised stipulated discovery plan that complies with Local Rule 26-1. ( Id. ) The parties filed a revised stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order that still does not comply with Local Rul..
More
ORDER
C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
On June 16, 2016, the court entered a minute order denying without prejudice the parties' stipulated discovery plan because it did not comply with Local Rule 26-1. (Min. Order (ECF No. 20).) The court required the parties to meet and confer and to file a revised stipulated discovery plan that complies with Local Rule 26-1. (Id.) The parties filed a revised stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order that still does not comply with Local Rule 26-1. (Stip Discovery Plan & Scheduling Order (ECF No. 21).) Specifically, the stipulated discovery plan does not contain the certifications required by Local Rule 26-1(b)(7)-(9).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties' stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order (ECF No. 21) is DENIED without prejudice. The parties must meet and confer and file a revised stipulated discovery plan that complies with Local Rule 26-1(b)(7)-(9) by July 21, 2016.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that by July 21, 2016, the attorneys in this case must file certifications stating that they have read Local Rule 26-1. The attorneys are advised that the court's local rules were amended effective May 1, 2016.
Source: Leagle
