BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. TIARA SUMMIT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, 2:16-cv-00611-APG-GWF. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160718c12
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 15, 2016
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. The Complaint (ECF No. 1) in this matter was filed March 18, 2016. Defendant Tiara Summit Homeowners Association filed its Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 24) on May 20, 2016. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet and/or confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) within 30 days after the first defendant answered
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. The Complaint (ECF No. 1) in this matter was filed March 18, 2016. Defendant Tiara Summit Homeowners Association filed its Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 24) on May 20, 2016. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet and/or confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) within 30 days after the first defendant answered ..
More
ORDER
GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. The Complaint (ECF No. 1) in this matter was filed March 18, 2016. Defendant Tiara Summit Homeowners Association filed its Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 24) on May 20, 2016. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet and/or confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) within 30 days after the first defendant answered or otherwise appeared, and 14 days thereafter to file a mandatory stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order not later than July 29, 2016 in compliance with the provisions of LR 26-1 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
Source: Leagle
