UNOPPOSED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff 2-Way Computing, Inc. ("Plaintiff") hereby files this Unopposed Motion and [Proposed] Order to Extend Deadline for Defendant to Respond to the Complaint in accordance with LR IA 6-1 and LR IA 6-2. This is the second request to extend the proposed deadline.

The first request for an extension, requesting a fifteen (15) day extension until July 12, 2016, was made on June 27, 2016 and has not yet been ruled on by this Court (Docket #8). This second request is for an additional fifteen (15) days (30 days total) until July 27, 2016.

This second request is being made after the original June 27, 2016. The failure to file this motion before the deadline was the result of excusable neglect as at the time the original request was made it was not known that the fifteen (15) days in the initial request would be insufficient time to discuss settlement and allow for Defendant to investigate the claims of the Complaint and obtain Nevada counsel.

The Complaint (Doc. 1) was filed on May 17, 2016 and was served on Grandstream Networks, Inc. on or about June 6, 2016. The current deadline to respond to the Complaint was June 27, 2016.

The parties believe that the litigation of this matter will be best served by allowing thirty (30) days beyond the original June 27, 2016 deadline to discuss possible settlement of this matter and allow Defendant additional time to investigate the claims of the Complaint and obtain Nevada counsel. Because an attorney for Defendant has not made an appearance in this case, Plaintiff files this motion to extend Defendant's deadline as an unopposed motion.

Accordingly, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court grant its request to continue the deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint until July 27, 2016.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.