Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MORRIS v. DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, 2:14-cv-01998-GMN-CWH. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160815b99 Visitors: 22
Filed: Aug. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 12, 2016
Summary: Stipulation and Order for Continuance of Response Deadline for Ditech's Motion for Summary Judgment (Third Request GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff, Robert Morris ("Mr. Morris"). and Defendant, Ditech Financial, LLC, fka Green Tree Servicing, LLC ("Ditech"), through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree to an extension for Mr. Morris to respond to Ditech's Motion for Summary Judgment (#61). Ditech filed its Motion for Summary Judgment (#61) on June 24, 2
More

Stipulation and Order for Continuance of Response Deadline for Ditech's Motion for Summary Judgment (Third Request

Plaintiff, Robert Morris ("Mr. Morris"). and Defendant, Ditech Financial, LLC, fka Green Tree Servicing, LLC ("Ditech"), through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree to an extension for Mr. Morris to respond to Ditech's Motion for Summary Judgment (#61).

Ditech filed its Motion for Summary Judgment (#61) on June 24, 2016, and the Court appointed a response date of July 18, 2016. The Court then granted the parties stipulation to extend the response date to July 25, 2016 (#68). The Court granted a second stipulation to extend the response date to August 8, 2016 (#71).

The parties have reached a tentative but substantive settlement and are still negotiating the precise language of the settlement agreement. They have diligently been negotiating and have made substantial progress and request that responsive deadline for the Motion for Summary Judgment be set for August 15, 2016, during which time the parties anticipate filing a stipulation and order to dismiss the case and withdraw the motion for summary judgment. The parties do not anticipate any further requests for extensions to response to the Motion for Summary Judgment.

This extension is not for the purpose of delay and will not affect any other deadlines in this case.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer